Sunday, March 31, 2013

I hate retractions, but sometimes it happens. So hold the phone on Jacob Demaris. Seems he married a Martha A. Kauffman, not Martha Wilson. I'll try to slow down on making assumptions
In my 3/29 post I mentioned that I was trying to figure out who Martha Demaris was that appears in the 1900 Census with Frank and Catharine Smith, and listed as sister-in-law. Mom comes through again. She found a Jacob B. Demaris in the General Index to Pension Files, 1861-1934, in which a Martha A. Demaris sought a widow's pension for his service in the K 59 Ohio Infantry after Jacob's death in 1916.
So I asked Mom, why sister Martha might have been living with the Smith's in 1900. She posited that since Catharine had lost a leg, perhaps Martha had come to stay and help during her convalescence. We don't really know when she lost her leg, but know it was later in her life. A life crisis like that could account for an extended stay that would have put her there during the census.
Was wondering why I was getting no comments on my blog posts. After viewing the auto emails generated when I post, I have come to realize that you are getting an email containing the post, but not an obvious link to the blog itself. There is a link to the blog at the end of the email, "Kantner Trace" which if you click on that link, the Kantner Trace website will open. The advantage of this, is that you will be able to see all of my posts, plus you can add comments to any of the posts you want to add your thoughts to. Hope that helps.

Friday, March 29, 2013

The 1900 Census, Pusheta Twp, Auglaize Co, OH shows a Martha Damaris in the household of Frank & Catharine Smith. She is listed as sister-in-law of Frank, b. Sept. 1858 (age 41), single, born in OH.

Q1. Is this Martha Wilson a sister of Catharine (as sister-in-law would suggest)? According to the 1860 Census, Crawford Twp, Coshocton Co, OH, Martha Wilson was 1 year old (census taken on 7/12/1860), so her age is right.

Q2. Why is she listed as Martha Damaris, SINGLE? Should have been "widow" or "divorced." Perhaps this was a little white lie.

Q3. Who was Mr. Damaris, and where was Mr. Damaris? I can find no record of a Damaris/Wilson marriage between 1878 and 1900. I have spelled it as Demaris without any better success.

On a side note, the whole Thomas & Mary (Chesta) Wilson family is somewhat elusive. They lived in Coshocton Co, OH at the time of the 1850 & 1860 censuses. But unable to find any but Catharine Amarella (who married Frank Smith) in any subsequent censuses.
Speaking of Family Bibles, in Jan 2011 I posted info on the Jack Family Bible, which has been passed down to me--in case you are interested.
There is also a Kantner Family Bible out there somewhere. It was reported to have been in the possession of a "Mrs. Graf, of Wapakoneta." I have written to the only Graf in the Wapak directory, but so far have not received a response.
So, today I'm looking at the 1900 Census, Pusheta Twp, Auglaize Co, OH in regard to Lorenz & Elizabeth Sammetinger, my great-great grandparents, their daughter Caroline Susanna being my great grandmother. Two families below their listing on the same page is a William and Catharine Sammetinger with children Grover W., Wilson W., Philander R. and Clara A. Can someone help me with their place in the family tree? Here are the pertinent facts given about them:
William, head, b. 12/1855 (age 44), married 12 yrs, b. in OH, parents b. in Germany
Catharine, wife, b. 11/1867 (age 32), mar. 12 yrs, birthed 5 children-4 survive, b. in OH, parents b. in OH

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

In my post yesterday, I referred to the Henry W. Schmidt/Smith Family Bible. My mother has copies of the Birth, Marriage, and Death pages which I have scanned. Mom told me who she believes has the actual Bible, but it slips my mind at the moment. Hope to have that info soon. Also, I got some interesting emails in response to the post, which provide some personal insights on Henry William. I need to check with the authors of those notes, to see if they mind having their insights shared with the rest of you. Please feel free to use the comment line beneath the post to share your thoughts with others. But if you wish your comments to remain personal, just shoot me an email. I promise not to "put it out there" unless you are agreeable.

Here is my transcription of the Bible. I believe the Bible to be the Word of God without error, but that obviously doesn't apply to the Birth, Marriage and Death Records that have been written in. There are some obvious errors. Perhaps you will notice others that I have missed. Off to the side I will add comments in brackets. Again, please feel free to comment on any aspect of this.


p. 1 “Family Record, Marriages:
Frank M. Schmidt & Catharine A. Schmidt, Nov. 4th, 1869"

p. 2 “Family Record, Births: [of Frank and Catarine Schmidt's sons and daughters-in-law]
Hattie M. Smith, b. 11/27/1879; d. 2/10/1960, 80y 2m 13d [Hattie Maud Jack, wife of Henry W. Smith]
Callie Smith, b. 4/27/1868; d. 5/29/1944, 76y 1m 2d [Carolyn "Callie" Englebrecht, wife of Charles Michael Smith]
Louis Simon Pfenning, b. 10/28/1886, d. 10/3/1967, 86y 11m 5d [husband of Anna "Annie" M. Smith]
Emma E. Smith, b. 10/30/1885, d. 7/24/1971, 85y 8m" [Emma Elizabeth Brautigam, wife of Francis Frederick Smith]

p. 3 “Family Record, Deaths: [Frank M. & Catharine A. Schmidt and their children and Frank's father]
Christena A. Schmidt, June 22, 1875
Margata M. Schmidt, July 23, 1878
Mr. Michael Schmidt Sen., May 14, 1878 [Frank's father]
Dory Schmidt, Feb 20, 1886
Lucinda Schmith [as it was actually spelled], Jan 4, 1888 [her birth and death year have both been overwritten, either changed from 1888 to 1889 or (as it appears to me) from 1889 to 1888--see below]
Cathern(sic) A. Smith, April 23, 1917 [mother "Catharine" Amarella Wilson Schmidt]
Frank M. Smith, June 24, 1918 [father]
Mrs. Athur (Amelia) Bechdolt, March 5, 1913
Charles M. Smith, Dec. 14, 1946
Henry W. Smith, Mar. 25, 1959
Fred F. Smith, June 10, 1952[(sic)] [Headstone at Greenlawn Cemetery gives the year as 1956]
(Rosa) Mrs. Raymond Synder[(sic)], March 9, 1960 [Rosa married Raymond "Snyder"]
Mrs. Louis Pfenning (Anna), Feb 9, 1975"

p. 4 “Family Record, Births: [parents and ten children]
Frank M. Schmidt, Aug. 26, 1847
Catharine A. Schmidt, Feb. 4, 1847
Charles M. Schmidt, Sep. 16, 1870
Christena A. Schmidt, Jul. 29, 1872 [died age 2]
Margrata M. Schmidt, Feb. 3, 1875 [died age 3]
William Henry Schmidt, Jan. 2, 1877 [actually Henry William]
Frank Frederic Schmidt, Feb. 1, 1879
Anna M. Schmidt, August 5, 1880
Amelia Elizibeth Schmidt, Nov. 5, 1882
Feb. 4, Rose Schmidt, 1885 [also given as Rosa, elsewhere; she and Dory were twins]
Feb 4, Dory Schmidt, 1885 [died age 16 days]
Jan. 4, Lucinda Schmidt, 1888" [died same day]

[Pages 5-8 follow Henry William (son of Frank M. & Catharine A. Schmidt), wife Hattie and his five children]

p. 5 “Family Register, Parents’ Names:
Husband: Henry W. Smith, Born Jan. 2, 1877, Son of Frank M. Smith and Catherine A. Wilson Smith
Wife: Hattie M. Jack Smith, Born Nov. 27, 1879 at Babcock Mills Penn., Daughter of John Jack and Clementine Rimmel Jack"

p. 6 “Deaths:
H. W. Smith died March 25, 1959
Hattie M. Smith passed away Feb 10, 1960"

p. 7 “Marriages:
Henry W. Smith and Hattie M. Jack married June 3, 1903
William Henry Smith and Ethel Jane Barrett were married Nov. 27, 1929
Leland Elbert Smith and Lucille Levada Valentine were married June 18, 1930
Mary Marguerite Smith and Ray Dwight Kantner were married July 29, 1931
[no marriage record was recorded for Luella Marie Smith]
Kathaleen Clementine Smith and Bryan Rogers Hefner were married March 17, 1938" [actually April 17, 1938]

p. 8 “Births:
William Henry Smith was born Monday Aug. 19, 1907
Leland Elbert Smith was born Sat. Oct 16, 1909
Mary Marguerite Smith was born Sun. July 30, 1911
Luella Marie Smith was born Mon. June 14, 1915
Kathaleen Clementine Smith was born Mon. Aug. 26, 1918”


Here are the birth and death records for Lucinda. What do you think, should it be 1888 or 1889?

Birth:







Death:

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

This post was going to be all about the Henry W. Schmidt/Smith Family Bible Records, but I got sidetracked when I discovered a discrepancy concerning the birthdate of Henry William Smith. This is the son of Francis "Frank" Michael Schmidt and Catherine Amarella Wilson, and husband of Hattie Maude Jack. My records indicated that Henry W. was born Feb. 2, 1877. The Henry William Smith Family Bible, in two separate entries, lists his birthdate as Jan. 2, 1877. This made me curious, so I consulted Ancestry.com and found that 4 out of five Family Trees had the Feb 2, 1877 birthdate. Upon further investigation I found his WWI Draft Registration that clearly states his birthdate as "January 1, 1877." Then I looked him up in the 1900 census, because the 1900 census provides the month and year of birth, unlike earlier censuses which only give the age and leave the researcher to estimate the year of birth. He is listed as being 23 years old, living with his parents in Pusheta Twp, Auglaize Co, OH in 1900. His month/year of birth is listed as Jan/1877. I then went looking for a birth record in the Auglaize Co, OH Official Birth Records. I found him listed on a page where the first half of the entries on the page had Month/Day/Year but Henry William Schmidt was on the half of the page that the clerk, apparently, felt that only the year was important, so it only records his birthdate as 1877. Then I went to his marriage record. It also states clearly that "Henry W. Smith is 26 years of age, on the second day of January, 1903." I have not been able to find his death certificate online, but as all other official documents support the Jan 2, 1877 date given in the Family Bible Records, I think we should feel confident in using Jan 2, 1877 as Henry William Schmidt/Smith's birthdate. Next time, I'll share the contents of the Schmidt Family Bible as I transcribed them.

Sunday, March 10, 2013

In my first post today, I had remarked that the 1920 census shows a Martha M. Gagley, living in the household of Elizabeth Gagley, and that if the age of that Martha was correct, and if she actually was Elizabeth (Kantner) Gagley's daughter, then she would have been born about two years before Joseph Gagley and Elizabeth Kantner were married. Plus there is a new inconsistency that comes to light. In the census, she has the middle initial M. whereas, the birth, marriage and death records of her children, where a middle name or initial is given, it is always Martha Jane or Martha J. or just Jane. Conclusion: Not ready to commit to this census's Martha being the Martha of the will. It could in fact be a daughter-in-law of Elizabeth, rather than her own daughter. But the 1927 Wapak phone directory, shows Elizabeth Gagley, widow of Joseph Gagley, living at 216 E. Auglaize St., Wapak which I believe, shows with virtual certainty that this is the Elizabeth Kantner who married Joseph Gagley.

It is interesting that the maiden name of the Martha is given as Kantner (or Kentner) as well as Gagley. Not only did this occur with her son, James H. McKibbin, but also with a daughter, Ancil (or Enzil) who married David A. Abbott. Ancil's marriage certificate states that she was born to William McKibben and Martha Gagely. But her death certificate gives her parents as Alexander McKibben and Martha Kentner.

Question: What does the fact that Martha's maiden name is sometimes given as Kantner, rather than Gagley suggest to you?

Question: Coming full circle, does any of this shed light on why, Martha, granddaughter (as I suppose) of Martin Kantner, receives interest on $400 until her husband dies and then receives the principal amt of Elizabeth Gagley's portion (who hasn't died) of Martin Kantner's estate? Seems strange to me, but perhaps a lawyer type might be able to shed some light on it.
This is rather unprecedented in the annals of Kantner Trace—2 posts in one day!
I have uncovered some interesting info that helps but does not solve the mystery of Martha McKibben, who was the source of such consternation in my last post. Let's see if I can boil it all down for you. Perhaps you can take what I've learned and connect the dots that are eluding me.

1. I believe I found the marriage record of Elex McKiben and Martha:
    William A. McKibben mar. 3/31/1876 to Martha J. Kentner in Kosciusko Co, IN
But if you are paying attention, you will be objecting. And I don't blame you. But I arrived at this conclusion via a round-a-bout route—I wanted to use "circuitis" but my spell checker isn't giving me the proper spelling, it just keeps slapping my fingers—but oh well.
Here goes:
I found a birth record for a James McKibbin, b. 9/13/1881, Union Twp, Auglaize Co, OH to an Alexander McKibbin and Jane Kantner. Then I found a marriage record for a James H. McKibbin and Maude Duncan in Kosciusko Co, IN. Marriage on 11/21/1906. The important thing is that the marriage certificate also states that James was born on 9/13/1881 in Wapakoneta, OH to William A. McKibbin and Martha J. Gagley. Study that for a while and I think you will see why I have drawn the conclusion that the Marriage Record of William McKibben and Martha Kentner, set forth above is the correct marriage record for the Elex McKiben and Martha (somehow related to Elizabeth Gagley) in Martin Kantner's Will.

Further findings after I return from "OZ, the Great and Powerful"
Sometimes tracking down relatives isn't easy. Case in point today, and hopefully one of you Kantner family members can help me out.

Subject: Heirs of the Estate of Martin Kantner (b. 11/15/1810, Berks Co, PA; married Catharine Bechdoldt 12/22/1831, Germantown, Montgomery Co, OH; d. 3/23/1894, Duchouquet Twp, Auglaize Co, OH; bur. Haruff Cemetery, Pusheta Twp, Auglaize Co, OH)

A list of the heirs of Martin Kantner is found in the Probate Records of Auglaize County, Case #4158. I have identified most of them, but one eludes me: William Bush, who is named as one of the heirs notified of the probate of Martin's will, and who signed his name to a document stating that he had received that notice. This he did in the presence of the Probate Judge of Auglaize County, so I assume that he lived in the vicinity of Wapak at the time (1894). His name does not appear in the body of the will, so I am assuming he is a relative. If you have any idea of his relationship to Martin Kantner, please let me know.

The second mystery to me is found in the body of the will, itself, which contains 5 parts and I here summarize to provide context:
1. All debts and funeral expenses to be paid ASAP after his decease
2. His wife to receive a 1/3 interest in the sale of all his real estate [she died after Martin but before his will was probated]
3. [I'll come back to this one as it is the one containing the mystery]
4. All the following married children share equally of the proceeds of his real and personal property:
John M. Kantner
Benjamin Kantner
Martin V. Kantner
Perry Kantner
Mary Gibbs
Hannah Burden
Matilda Snyder
Rosanna Smith
Rachael Kroft [she actually married a John Jacob Graf, not Kroft]
Henry Kantner [odd since he died 16 years previous to the will and his children are named as heirs]
Elizabeth Gagley
5. Executor should make sale of real and personal property as soon as convenient after his death

Back to #3 which I transcribe in it's entirety:
"3rd, I bequeath to Martha McKiben the interest on four hundred dollars interest to be paid annually as long as her husband Elex McKiben lives. After his death, she shall receive the principal acct [or amt] of Elizabeth Gegley's portion of my estate."

Of the three persons named here, I know one: Elizabeth Gegley was the daughter of Martin and Catharine Kantner, b. 8/1/1840, who married Joseph Gagley, 10/1/1861, and d. 9/14/1929 in Wapak

My first thought was that Martha McKiben was the daughter of Joseph and Elizabeth (Kantner) Gagley, which seems born out by the 1920 Census, Wapakoneta, Ward 2, Auglaize County, OH (Family #61) where we find a Martha M. Gagley, widow, age 62, listed as a boarder in the household of Elizabeth Gagley, widow, age 79, at 216 [E] Auglaize St, Wapak. But perhaps this raises as many questions as it answers.
1. If this Martha Gagley is Elizabeth's daughter, why is she listed as a boarder, rather than her daughter; and if she is Elizabeth's daughter, she would have been born 2 years before Elizabeth married Joseph Gagley?
2. If this Martha Gagley was married to an Elex McKiben [or Alex McKibben], why isn't she listed as such in the census rather than going by her maiden name?

On the positive side, Elizabeth's age would be right, the place of her birth and that of her parents would be right. And if the Martha listed here is her daughter, the state in which her mother was born would be right. I don't know where her father, Joseph, was born.

I am searching for more info, but any help on sorting this out would be appreciated.